Monthly Archives: June 2011

“This is the way the summer begins…

not with a bang but a whimper.”  (With apologies to T.S. Eliot)

I’ve never run a marathon, and don’t plan to in this lifetime, but I can imagine myself crawling across the finish line, gasping for air between muscle cramps and heart palpitations. That’s only a slightly overstated metaphor for my last official day of the 2010-2011 school year. What a year it was.

Over the past five years I’ve learned the value of letting go of the past. While at times rather unpleasant, this past school year wasn’t as bad as some other years. Letting things go is a skill I’m still mastering, but I’m getting better at it. Out with old, etc.

So, summer lies ahead. I’m already in my post-school slump. There’s always been a two-week transition period between the frenetic activity of the school year and the laid-back summer months. Well, actually summer weeks; by mid-August I’m gearing up for the next round. I compare it to taking the lid off a boiling pot of water: the pressure gets released and for a time the water bubbles & seethes & spill all over the stove, then it settles down. By the end of next week I should begin enjoying the slower pace.

It’s going to be a quiet summer. Money’s tight, so no trips, & not too many outings. It’s going to be good for us, though. Anne & I have been talking a lot about simplifying our life–learning to be less hectic, taking more time to read & talk, go on walks, and so on. We want to keep Mary active, but we don’t have to always be rushing to & fro, spending money that we don’t have. This summer will be a chance to reset.

I do want to write more this summer. I surprised at how little I’ve written over the past decade. It’s not as if the flood gates have opened, but it’s gotten more comfortable. I can’t imagine I have much interesting to write, but I suppose we do these things more for ourselves anyway.

Dear Dad:

Dear Dad:
I know it hasn’t been that long since I’ve talked to you, but as you know it’s been over 19 years since we actually had a face-to-face conversation. On this side of the veil it’s hard to hear responses. Today is Father’s Day, though, and I wanted to write a letter to you as I used to do years ago. I guess you already know all of this, but it still feels good to talk.

I miss our conversations, you know. Some of my most cherished memories are those of sitting at the kitchen table with you sharing a couple beers or glasses of wine & talking about politics, religion, our family, My Fair Lady, and pretty much anything that came to mind. Remember when you went off on Reagan, calling him a senile old man? I still chuckle over that one. It certainly made me feel better for never having voted Republican, because I knew how you, & Granddad, & Great-Granddad had all believed very strongly in the old GOP. It’s probably a good thing you’re past politics now. The compassion–love, really–that you felt for others, especially those who were struggling just to get by, doesn’t have much place in politics now, Republican & Democrat alike. I think you’d be disgusted with the whole lot.

Mostly I miss talking to you about faith, though. Growing up the son of priest was, honestly, good. Did you know that watching you all those Sundays in church–saying Mass, preaching, talking to parishioners, even singing in your (somewhat off-key) voice–built up such a love of God that even getting sent to war wouldn’t shake it? Somehow, I don’t think you did. You weren’t the kind of dad who preached tohis kids; you were the kind whose life was homily enough. Without ever putting it into words, you taught me that our faith goes far beyond the details of canon and dogma. You taught me that our faith is but a path to a transcendent spiritual life. Now that I think of it, I can’t recall a time outside of Sunday services in which I saw you pray, though I know you did every day. To me, your life was your prayer, and that taught & affected me more than if you’d insisted on a daily family prayer time.

I remember how we used to talk about the problems in the Episcopal Church, but also about how much we cared about it, too. It was hard for you, I know, having been pushed aside by so many of your brother & sister priests, just because you hadn’t gone to seminary. You had such wisdom to share, both spiritual and worldly, and those who listened to you were always touched & moved. And you never wanted to climb the ladder of church hierarchy, so you never engaged in the politicking that is truly a blemish on the church (all churches, in fact). I know it hurt, though; after having dedicated so much of yourself to the church, and having sacrificed so much that affected your family, you ended your priesthood feeling largely ignored by all but a few. We’re only human, aren’t we? I wish with all my heart that in your last years you had felt the same appreciation & gratitude from the institution that you served as you did from the hundreds of men & women whose lives you touched. It wasn’t fair.

You know, of course, that I’m Roman Catholic now. I made my journey to Rome after you left us for quite a few reasons, but principle among them was because of what you taught me (again, by example) about the beauty and spiritual depth of the Mass. I came to know it as a time when the separation between this world and the next is much less distinct, that it is a moment in time when Heaven and Earth become one, even if it’s for a brief moment as we reckon time. I no longer felt that in the Episcopal churches I went to. Whenever Anne & I went to Mass in a Catholic church, I did. Then Mom told me, shortly after you left us, about your friendship with the Catholic priest in Madras, how you had wished you could have gone to Mass at St. Patrick’s, and how, if you were younger, you might have made the conversion yourself. I knew that I could make the change without regret (just like Mom did, later). Sort of like having your permission, I suppose, to do what I felt was right. And it has been right, Dad. I still feel the same awe and wonder now that I did when I was just a boy watching you at the altar. Sometimes, in fact, I feel as if you are there in front of me at the altar still.

You & Mom were active with the Anglican Society of St. Francis after I left home. Now that I’m a Secular Franciscan in the Order that Francis founded nearly 800 years ago, I’ve come to better understand what you (& Mom) felt in those years. You’d already been a priest of twenty years by then, and you knew what was important about faith and what was merely packaging. I understand now how you saw, like Francis, that a Christian’s life should be both prayer and a sermon. I’m afraid I’m not very good at it, but I’m trying to learn. You were a good example. By the way, say “hi” to Francis for me.

There are some other things, Dad, that I wish I could talk to you about, things that we never discussed back then. I know you were proud of me for serving in the military, but I wish I knew if it was a qualified pride. I think I understand now why you went back into the Army when Korea started up. You joined the Army in 1944, but that was too late to have served overseas in WWII. I’m guessing that you returned to the Army because you felt your wartime service was incomplete. Did you go to Korea because you needed to go to war after so many hundreds of thousands of men had before you? You had deferments in the 1940s because you worked in the packing industry, vital to the war effort. Did you feel guilty because you stayed home with your wife and two small children while so many others left for Europe & the Pacific? I wish I would have asked you that (not that you would have necessarily told me).

When I was called up for Iraq, I admit that a part of me was excited. This is what I’d trained for, after all. But I was also deeply torn, knowing that Anne & our kids were going to be here worrying about and waiting for me. I was at odds with myself, and I wish I could have talked to you about how you confronted that same quandary. I’ve felt a deep and pervasive guilt almost since the moment I was mobilized seven years ago this week. Did you feel that, too?

When I was in Iraq, I confronted the darker side of myself, of my nation, and of humanity. I’m still trying to sort out what I feel about all that. I’m guessing you confronted the same feelings. It changes the way one lives his life, knowing that the image we have of ourselves & others too often ignores the reality of what we are capable of doing. Like you, I didn’t serve in the worst of it. Like you, though, I felt my participation in war very deeply.

Looking back on my boyhood and the early years of my adult life, I can recall a number of things about you, Dad, that lead me to believe that you, too, struggled with PTSD. No one talked about it in your day, unfortunately, and that silence must have been very difficult to bear. I can see, though, how hard you worked to notstay turned inwards all the time. I can see how you avoided situations that you knew would make you angry. I can see that you struggled with depression (you never would have admitted it). I wonder: did you have nights when you cried over what you’d lost? Were there times when you felt a soul-deep despair over the ignorance & brutality of humanity? Were there times when you wished for your life to be over sooner rather than later? I’ll never know in this life, but I suspect that you felt these things, and others, just as I do.

Remember in 1966 when you took me to the funeral of the young soldier killed in Vietnam? I know now that you wanted me to see the real price of war. Thank you, Dad.

There’s so much more I wish that I could discuss with you, Dad. Even here in my 50s, I still need you. But even though we can’t sit down at the table & talk about things heavy & light, I know you’re not very far away. I want you to know that you have given me the strength & love & faith to not simply endure life but to actually live it. Thanks, Dad. I love you.

Andy

June 16, 2004–The Sacred Wound

June 16, 2004

I began writing this entry earlier today, and had several paragraphs written before I realized I was hiding. For the past 5-1/2 years, my VA psychologist (a woman to whom I quite literally owe my life) has been patiently coaching me to speak of my feelings rather than explaining my thoughts. I have been gifted with some intelligence, but I too often use the rational as a mask for my emotional side. I’m doing it now, in fact. But the truth is that Iraq & its aftermath has been, is, and will remain an emotional battleground within me, so I’ll leave my “thoughtful” description of how I got to where I am for another post. Today I need to write from the heart.

Because today marks the seventh anniversary of my mobilization with the National Guard for the Iraq War.

It’s one of those “anniversaries” that have come to punctuate my life since I returned in late 2005 and began living with PTSD. For those who carry the lingering affects of trauma, anniversaries can be triggers for troubling memories, anxiety attacks, poor sleep & bad dreams, relationship issues, and (for some) problematic behaviors. At least, these are the affects that I’m most familiar with, having been learning to manage them over the past 5-1/2 years. All things considered, I think I’m doing fairly well; despite this disability, I’m able to work full time, and the most important relationships in my life–those with my wife and children–are not only sound but have even grown stronger in many ways. Still, I’m not sanguine about how my mobilization for & participation in the Iraq War has impacted my life. I’m not the same man I was seven years ago.

I was betrayed. We were betrayed. And I can never again–never again–trust the men & women who have been placed (by…?) in authority in our nation’s institutions.  I have promised myself, my family, my God that I will never again allow myself to be an agent of evil wrapped in the flag of patriotism.

I have been angry for seven years. I’m angry now. I’m angry at what I was made to do. I’m angry at how the sincere, honest, and honorable intentions of the men & women in my unit were taken advantage of by cynical, venal, self-righteous men. I’m angry at how the military, an institution that I gave twenty years of my life to, was made to prosecute an unjust, illegal, and immoral war against a nation that posed little threat to us. I’m angry at the cost my family has had to pay for my service. I’m angry–very angry–over the thousands of young American lives snuffed out by this war, and the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who have suffered & died as a result of what we as a nation have done. Most of all, I’m angry at myself for having been a part of this.

Anger is an emotion that springs from the very core of our being. It’s a symptom, really, rather than a state. I’m angry, but I’ve followed that anger deeper into myself to discover that it springs from a hurt deep within–a wound, as it were. No bullet or shrapnel pierced my body, but Iraq wounded me, wounded my soul. Not only seeing evil all around me but also realizing I was participating in that evil cuts & burns very, very deep. Such realizations slash through one’s self-image, one’s view of humanity, one’s faith in institutions and (for some) even in God. One’s self is left is tatters.

The turning point in my healing was coming to believe that this soul-wound need not lead to death–spiritual or corporal. Some wounds can lead a person to become a new person altogether, one who is wiser, stronger, better at being him- or herself. Some wounds can become sacred.

I’m by no means suggesting that I’ve achieved any degree of enlightenment as a result of Iraq. I haven’t, and I doubt that I’ll come anywhere near that state any time soon–probably never in this life. But having understood that wounds of the spirit can potentially lead one to a better place, I’ve been able to move beyond the all-consuming pain & anxiety that I felt early on. The pain and anxiety can serve a positive purpose; and, although I have little idea what that purpose might be, I can live with the hope.

I never wanted the experiences of the past seven years, just as I never imagined that they would cause such a dissolution of the old “me.” It has happened, though, and I believe that I will eventually emerge a better person for having lived through these experiences. At least, that’s my hope, and my prayer.

—–

A footnote: It’s been a surprise how isolating these experiences have been. I’ve been very fortunate to have a wife and children who never gave up on me during those dark years after I returned home. With their love & help, I was able to learn again how to show love & affection, how to laugh & cry, how to live as a part of a family. It must be like a stroke victim learning to speak and walk again by using different parts of the brain; for me it was learning to love using the undamaged parts of my heart.

On the other hand, I’ve learned how few people are willing to come up to a person and ask truly how he or she is doing. I suppose people are uncomfortable with approaching someone struggling with PTSD. Perhaps our seemingly isolating behaviors are taken personally. Perhaps there’s a fear that asking, “How are you?” will somehow trigger a sort of negative response. I don’t know. What I have come to see is how few people whom I have considered friends have been willing to simply maintain a personal connection to me, how few people are willing to help support my healing. I suppose such things are easier when the damage is physical: cancer, a missing limb, a crippling disease. But, that’s another thing I’ve learned to accept & live with; it does, however, add to the sadness.

“At the center of non-violence stands the principal of love.”

“At the center of non-violence stands the principal of love.” Martin Luther King, Jr.

Continuing my reflections on quotes related to conscience and peace, I wanted to explore Martin Luther King’s observation that non-violence, true non-violence, is founded upon love. I started writing on this a couple weeks ago, but found that the simplicity of the statement made my words appear unnecessary. A couple of starts produced nothing satisfying; I pretty much decided that King’s words should stand on their own and move on to another quote. Love & non-violence are so closely tied together that any commentary thereupon seems, at best, superfluous.

Today, however, I found myself coming back to these words from a different direction. One of the books I’m currently reading (I generally have four or five going at the same time) is The Dark Night of the Soul: A Psychiatrist Explores the Connection Between Darkness and Spiritual Growth, by Gerald G. May, MD. May’s book explores the spiritual relationship between St. Teresa of Ávila and St. John of the Cross, both sixteenth century Carmelites, reformers, writers, mystics, and subsequently Doctors of The Church. Teresa was, as May explains, John’s mentor & confidant, his “spiritual mother,” nourishing him with her images and visions of the spiritual life (32). Taken together, their visionary understanding of humanity’s unity with God forms the basis of a Christian spirituality that sounds much the same as those of Hindu, Buddhist, Zoroastrian, Sikh, and other faith traditions. Teresa writes that while in prayer God told her to “Seek yourself in Me, and in yourself seek Me” (43; from her poem “Buscando a Dios,” “Seeking God”). This itself seems to me a logical extension of Christ’s words,

“And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate to be with you always, the Spirit of truth, which the world cannot accept, because it neither sees nor knows it. But you know it, because it remains with you, and will be in you. I will not leave you orphans” (Jn 14: 16-18)

…keeping in mind that, as Catholics, the Spirit is one aspect of the Trinity that is God. God has His home in us, and we in him: “God in me, and I in God” (45).

May goes on to discuss Teresa’s & John’s belief that the spiritual journey on which we find ourselves is not truly a journey of discovery but one of becoming conscious of that which already exists: our unity with God. This might make for another posting in the future, but I want to bring this back to King’s connection of non-violence & love. As I read May’s writing, I couldn’t help but recall one of my favorite lines from the New Testament: “We have come to know and to believe in the love God has for us. God is love, and whoever remains in love remains in God and God in him” (1Jn: 16: NAB). Love itself is an aspect of God, so by our very nature we have, at the core of our being, both the Divine and its aspect, Love. This is the same Love that gave rise to and that animates all of creation, the Love that is the active, creative nature of God.

As in so many things spiritual, however, we grasp only the shadow of Divine Love, though we bandy the word “love” about rather freely. When a person is truly and deeply in love (Anne & I celebrated our 31st anniversary last week, so I’ve been thinking a lot lately about being deeply in love), he or she begins to know what Love truly is, although it is akin to the scent of a rose hinting at the reality of the flower: “For now we see through a glass, darkly”(1 Cor: 12: I like this, the King James version, better). The love that we feel for another, for humanity, for all of creation is the image of and a pathway to the Love that is God that sits at the center of our being. Love is a divine gravity that moves us towards God.

This brings me to the subject of non-violence. As above, love & non-violence go hand-in-hand. Love (capital L) is of God, the Divine, The Source, The Eternal Essence. God The Creator, who is Love, is within His/Her/Its creation (we can also say in love with His/Her/Its creation). Even in our human state, we understand that loving something created of oneself–a child being the best example–precludes even the notion of violence. Christ teaches this in the seventh chapter of Matthew: “Which one of you would hand his son a stone when he asks for a loaf of bread, or a snake when he asks for a fish?” (v 9-10). How much more does the Love that is God negate all forms of violence against any of His (/Her/Its) creation? It appears that violence is by its nature an act against God. Violence is blasphemy.

So if God is Love, and God-Love dwells in us, then we are called to non-violence just as we are called to be conscious of God’s home in us. That humanity has become, in many people’s eyes, synonymous with violence speaks more to our inability to perceive the Divine within, our “fallen state,” than in the reality of our nature. It is, in fact, human nature to be nonviolent, not the other way around.

Teresa, John, and countless & uncounted saints & mystics–Christian & non-Christian alike–came to know that seeking God within oneself is neither easy nor comfortable; it follows that embracing non-violence, which is embracing Love, is also a challenge like no other that we face in this lifetime. Non-violence, like Love, is an active principle. Neither lie still awaiting our embrace. Cesar Chavez said that “Non-violence is not inaction. It is not discussion. It is not for the timid or weak… Non-violence is hard work.” Just as lovers continually express their love for one-another, we must continually express the  non-violence that lies within us.

As Christians–and as Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, etc., even secularists–we are called to a prophetic role in the world. We are called to be a continual reminder that violence is always a sign of failure, that violence is against our nature, that violence ultimately begets more violence. We are called to be, in the words of another saint, instruments of peace.

It’s a beautiful  spring morning of what promises to be a mild, pleasant day. The calm after the storm, I guess. Judging by midwestern standards, yesterday’s storms here in Massachusetts were moderately dramatic. By New England standards, they were devastating. We just don’t get tornados here; certainly not the number that swept along the Mass Pike. Four people lost their lives, nineteen communities seriously affected, homes lost, business destroyed. Yesterday’s already being put into the same category as the 1938 hurricane.

We’re about 50 miles north of the worst of the storms, so the most we got was wind & lightening. Thankfully. But my heart goes out to all those who were in the storm track, and especially the families of those who died yesterday. The sudden violence that nature can summon up not only humbles but also reminds us that our world is far more precarious than modern society makes it appear. People’s ability and willingness to help and support others even in the face of disasters, natural or human-made, is what makes us civilized.

More weather cont’d

ANOTHER storm has popped up, this time headed down Route 2 towards us. What a weird day!

The news just reported that the storm will hit us around 8:45-50. 

 

 

 

Weather, cont’d

Looks like the storm that was headed our way has dissipated. The more serious storm that passed through Springfield is still creating problems to our south, but it looks like we dodged it. It’s still windy with a few sprinkles, but the sky has brightened. Hopefully this will be the most dramatic weather of the summer–but I’m not holding my breath.

Tornados in Massachusetts

The weird weather continues, this time with tornado watches & warning for central Massachusetts. One or two funnel clouds were spotted in Springfield & there are reports of some damage. While tornados aren’t unknown here, they’re not usual. I’m watching the news channels, which are tracking the storms as they move through the area. It’s taking me back to when I was growing up in Kansas & Missouri when these events were normal from spring through fall. I spent more than a few hours in basements back then, but it’s been nearly 40 years since I left the midwest. I can’t say that I’m anxious to head to the basement, but the excitement I felt as a boy is still there. The storm is still about 25 miles west of us, but the worst seems to be headed just south of us.